![]() The MP is a deprecated machine, on its way out, and maybe you could get one cheap, although they seem to remain overpriced new.īut why a new Mac? why not use the MBP? or even trade up to a newer, faster MBP and just lose the old 21"? Yeah, a MP would be faster than your 21", but not a good value at all. Performance With every new generation of Intel chips, Apple sees fit to update its computers that have them, the hardware refresh seeing some new tech that makes the machines even better than before. Its onboard graphics.5 answers 50 votes: There is no such thing as a Late 20132015 iMac. I wouldn't ever wanna go back to a 2.5k monitor after using a modern iPhone, retina MBP, etc. Our review computer was an Intel Core i5 set to 3.4GHz, with 8GB RAM, the 2GB GeForce GTX 755M graphics chipset, and a 1TB Fusion drive. Its almost unbelievably power efficient, using half the power (or less) of similar Intel chips. I dunno what monitor you have and what MBP, but using an old low resolution monitor, even if better with color, as the only monitor for a computer might be a less than pleasing experience. Externally, the iMac Intel 27' EMC 2639 looks identical to the previous generation, but the interior specs have been upgraded: 3. The Mac Pro is spec'd with 3.7 GHz Intel Xeon E5 Quad-Core and Dual AMD FirePro D300 GPUs (2 x 2GB) I'm not super spec tech knowledgeable but how would that compare to a 2017 iMac? (3.4GHz (3.8 Boost) quad-core 7th-generation Intel Core i5 processor and Radeon Pro 570 with 4GB video memory) Apple iMac 27-inch, Late 2013 - 3.2GHz Core i5 Compatible Memory / RAM Upgrades Installation is Easy with Fast & Professional Support Installation Support. ![]() This is the time-lapse of the upgrade proce. They both go for roughly the same amount so thats not a major deciding factor to me. We upgrade a Late 2013 27' iMac base model to the maxed out configuration with i7 processor, 3 Tb SSD, 32 Gb ram. Apple's 27in iMac is the firm's flagship workstation for graphics and video applications, and has been a favourite within publishing and multimedia companies. I don't really have the desk space for a 27 inch iMac + my current external monitor, but I didn't know if the 2017 would be a better performer than the 2013. ![]() I'm leaning toward a Mac Pro since it doesn't have a built in monitor and can use my 27 inch external monitor which will also be used by my MBP. I'm looking to replace my current desktop computer (21in Mid-2010 iMac).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |